[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: update of stable for gv for non-critical #393454 ?



At 1178964483 time_t, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> somehow I couldn't find the current criteria for stable updates, so I 
> ask here.
> 
> Would a quite annoying but definitely not critical bug like gv not 
> reading settings from ~/.gv [1] qualify for an update in stable? It 
> is a regression from sarge.

Not RC, not accepted.

cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: