Am Mittwoch, 3. Januar 2007 23:47 schrieb Steve Langasek: > I think Andi meant that it should be possible for someone with an interest > in the package to get it back into a releasable state -- not that the > current package would be considered appropriate for inclusion in etch. > > I certainly don't intend to let uclibc back into etch in its current state; > and probably not at all given the timeline, though Andi could choose to do > so. Understood. Then be it - I just don't have the time right now to beat uclibc into shape. with best regards, Rene
Attachment:
pgpygvagHkQ1_.pgp
Description: PGP signature