Re: Bug#439670: depends on non-existing version of ecj-gcj
Rene Engelhard writes:
> Hi,
>
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> > about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> > ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
> > land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do you gain
> > by blocking transitions of depending packages by weeks? Is this really
> > wanted?
>
> And what do you gain from making them (== packages build-deping on
> java-gcj-compat-dev) unbuildable (on clean sids, and - more importantly -
> on the buildds)?
no, it doesn't change anything, as the new gcj packages did conflict
with the new java-gcj-compat. you yourself did point out that in an
earlier bug report and did request that conflict. so things are not
worse than before.
Reply to: