Hi, Matthias Klose wrote: > no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait > about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If > ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to > land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do you gain > by blocking transitions of depending packages by weeks? Is this really > wanted? And what do you gain from making them (== packages build-deping on java-gcj-compat-dev) unbuildable (on clean sids, and - more importantly - on the buildds)? That doesn't help the transitions either. Gr??e/Regards, Ren? -- .''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature