Re: gcc plans for the lenny cycle
* Matthias Klose (doko@cs.tu-berlin.de) [070415 15:34]:
> Martin Michlmayr writes:
> > FWIW, I've been keeping track of 4.2 related package bugs:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.2;users=tbm@cyrius.com
>
> Martin Michlmayr writes:
> > "a few" =~ 400, but yes, they are trivial to fix and patches for
> > almost all of them exist. I'll start filing other 4.3 related bugs in
> > the coming weeks.
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.3;users=tbm@cyrius.com
>
> I would like to see these as beeing considered RC (or at least
> important), so that these get fixed now with regular updates, and do
> not need to be fixed in a concentrated effort just before the
> introduction of a new compiler.
I don't see any reason to not upgrade them all to important as of now
(and we'll probably have some release goals again, and having "compiles
with gcc-x.y" for all (future) x.y as goal seems like a good idea to me.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: