Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:27:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200704101228.07234.elendil@planet.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 646152.60662.qm@web38202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <[🔎] 646152.60662.qm@web38202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

On Tuesday 10 April 2007 11:35, Seth Lang wrote:
> Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?

http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=229913&cid=18654143

Attachment: pgpUc3lQKBJaH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
  - From: Seth Lang <sethlang@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Next by Date: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Previous by thread: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Next by thread: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread