Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?

To: "Joey Schulze" <joey@infodrom.org>
Cc: "Seth Lang" <sethlang@yahoo.com>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
From: "Pankaj Jangid, पंकज जाँगिङ" <pankaj.jangid@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:43:21 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] fa301f730704100313q34106c44p7c02e5f6ac68a55c@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070410100314.GT28276@finlandia.home.infodrom.org>
References: <[🔎] 646152.60662.qm@web38202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 20070410100314.GT28276@finlandia.home.infodrom.org>

If no one is critical then why the list of release critical bugs has

0 entries. I am sure these ones are critical for someone.


Regards,
Pankaj

On 4/10/07, Joey Schulze <joey@infodrom.org> wrote:

Seth Lang wrote:
> Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?

Out of curiosity, which bugs in etch are so critical that you cannot
work with etch and that they would warrant another delay?

Regards,

        Joey

--
Linux - the choice of a GNU generation.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
  - From: Seth Lang <sethlang@yahoo.com>
- Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
  - From: Joey Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Next by Date: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Previous by thread: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Next by thread: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread