On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > Santiago Vila a écrit : > > >I agree that it's a little bit late for this, but we could downgrade > > > >to standard at least, and it would still be present on install CDs > >(we have a policy of including all standard and above packages in > >netinst and CD images, don't we?). > > > (Yes) > I requested the priority of an important package to be downgraded to > standard recently and Don Armstrong suggested to drop it since it made > no difference anyway (as you say, it doesn't change most/all CD images). > That was a non-dummy package which should stay in the archive in the > foreseeable future. I'm sure that downgrading libsasl2's priority to > standard is a waste of time. > Would you say the same about the documentation package? Didn't someone just recently complain that the -doc package's important priority caused to be included on the netinst image? Perhaps I am remembering incorrectly. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature