Re: Please consider iceape-l10n/1.0.7-2 for etch
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:02:07PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > OTOH, there seems to be fairly little user testing here; none of the
> > iceape-l10n-* packages have more than 15 users registered with popcon. So
> > I'm reluctant to unblock such packages which could have significant negative
> > impact on the user's browser if bugs are hiding.
> Having maintained iceweasel-l10n for a while now, would it be of any
> effect for you wrt/ its etch migration if I would had a look at the
> iceape-l10n (*not* ment ironic: I don't feel offended if you say no)?
Are the iceape and iceweasel l10n APIs identical? Are the contents of the
packages identical? I'm pretty sure the answer is "no"; so information
about iceweasel doesn't really translate to assurance about the iceape
versions.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: