Re: Bug#414124: linux-ntfs is not binNMU safe

[Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch>]

Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:

> 1.13.1-6+b1, not 1.13.1-6.0.1.  (surely this is documented everywhere by
> now?)

Except in my head, in the parts loaded into memory.

>> The upload to t-p-u is necessary because fuse in sid has a new upstream
>> version, and a package compiled against this version cannot propagate to
>> etch.  vorlon suggested version numbers 1.13.1-7 for unstable and
>> 1.13.1-6+etch1 for testing-proposed-updates.  I think -7 must be
>> uploaded first.
>
> Yes.  (Was that the only question?)

Yes, sorry to bother you.  I forgot to remove the "question to RMs
below" after we talked on IRC.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)