[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Please unblock wu-ftpd 2.6.2-25



Dear release team,

Please unblock wu-ftpd 2.6.2-25.

It fixes some translations (de, eu, ja), and a typo.
Unfortunately, some old PO files were added (*.po~), but that should not
be a problem. I CC wu-ftpd's maintainer in case he wants to fix this in a
later upload.

Here is the debdiff's diffstat:

 debian/po/ca.po~                      |  267 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/cs.po~                      |  271 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/de.po~                      |  285 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/eu.po~                      |  279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/fr.po~                      |  279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/ja.po~                      |  276 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/nl.po~                      |  276 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/pl.po~                      |  283 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/pt.po~                      |  269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/sv.po~                      |  273 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/po/vi.po~                      |  271 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/addftpuser       |    2 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/changelog        |    9 +
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/ca.po         |    2 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/cs.po         |    2 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/de.po         |   80 ++++-----
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/eu.po         |    7 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/fr.po         |    2 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/ja.po         |  109 ++++++-------
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/nl.po         |    2 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/pl.po         |    2 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/pt.po         |    2 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/sv.po         |    2 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/templates.pot |    2 
 wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/po/vi.po         |    2 
 25 files changed, 3145 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)

Kind Regards,
-- 
Nekral



Reply to: