[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please unblock cowdancer 0.25



Hi,

> > cowdancer 0.25 has been in unstable for quite a while, and fixes 
> > behavior bug that is found in 0.24. Please unblock and include into etch.
> 
> > cowdancer (0.25) unstable; urgency=low
> 
> >   * Bug fix: "cowdancer: Better explain how to use cowbuilder to build
> >     packages", thanks to Nelson A. de Oliveira (Closes: #405090).
> >   * Bug fix: "cowdancer: cannot build gnustep-base with cowbuilder",
> >     thanks to Hubert Chan (Closes: #402669).
> >     Do not canonicalize lchown.
> 
> >  -- Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>  Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:54:09 +0900
> 
> --- /tmp/vVbnTESpNT/cowdancer-0.24/Makefile     2006-07-01 05:23:20.000000000 +0000
> +++ /tmp/8MqBhzX6i5/cowdancer-0.25/Makefile     2006-12-31 06:53:04.000000000 +0000
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>         gcc -D_REENTRANT -fPIC $< -o $@ -c -Wall -O2 -g
> 
>  %.o: %.c
> -       gcc $< -o $@ -c -Wall -O2 -g
> +       gcc $< -o $@ -c -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing
> 
>  clean:
>         -rm -f *~ *.o *.lo $(BINARY)
> 
> What is the reason for this change, not documented in the Debian changelog?

This is to shut up a compiler warning on x86_64. Non-user visible
changes are not documented in debian changelog.
 
> (Why does a native package have a separate ChangeLog and debian/changelog?)

regards,
	junichi
-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project



Reply to: