[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please unblock cowdancer 0.25



Hi Junichi,

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:43:36PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

> cowdancer 0.25 has been in unstable for quite a while, and fixes 
> behavior bug that is found in 0.24. Please unblock and include into etch.

> cowdancer (0.25) unstable; urgency=low

>   * Bug fix: "cowdancer: Better explain how to use cowbuilder to build
>     packages", thanks to Nelson A. de Oliveira (Closes: #405090).
>   * Bug fix: "cowdancer: cannot build gnustep-base with cowbuilder",
>     thanks to Hubert Chan (Closes: #402669).
>     Do not canonicalize lchown.

>  -- Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>  Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:54:09 +0900

--- /tmp/vVbnTESpNT/cowdancer-0.24/Makefile     2006-07-01 05:23:20.000000000 +0000
+++ /tmp/8MqBhzX6i5/cowdancer-0.25/Makefile     2006-12-31 06:53:04.000000000 +0000
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
        gcc -D_REENTRANT -fPIC $< -o $@ -c -Wall -O2 -g

 %.o: %.c
-       gcc $< -o $@ -c -Wall -O2 -g
+       gcc $< -o $@ -c -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing

 clean:
        -rm -f *~ *.o *.lo $(BINARY)

What is the reason for this change, not documented in the Debian changelog?

(Why does a native package have a separate ChangeLog and debian/changelog?)

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: