Le samedi 24 février 2007 à 15:15 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:54:34PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Because of various "small" ABI changes, it looks like *all* packages in > > sarge that depend on libeel2-2 don't work with the etch version. To fix > > that situation so late in the release process, I have added an > > appropriate Conflicts: field and uploaded it to unstable. This is > > 2.14.3-3. > > Unblocked. Thanks. > > Of course, the real solution is to change the SONAME correctly. Because > > the ABI seems to have changed in all (well, maybe all but one) GNOME > > releases from 2.8 to 2.16, I have added a release number corresponding > > to the GNOME version and uploaded it to experimental, which means future > > versions won't cause such trouble. This is 2.16.3-2. > > > If the release team feels like it, I can upload the same fix in > > unstable, but it will require a handful of binNMUs for related packages. > > I'd say we should get 2.14.3-3 into testing first to ensure we have a fix, > then we can consider a quick library transition afterwards, yes. As 2.14.3-3 is now in testing, I've uploaded 2.14.3-4 to unstable with the same changes as 2.16-3-2. It is currently sitting in NEW. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=