Re: Bug#409882: changes in upstream
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:13:09PM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 11:43:15AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> > > Given all this, would still be possible to consider this for etch ?
> > ...which would require another round of main and non-free conglomeration
> > packages in NEW, together with removals in testing and unstable of the
> > non-free ones. Don't know if we can make this happen as it's not
> > depending on me.
> Well, what does -release have to say about this?
Not a high priority. We might look at it for etch once uploaded, if the
changes are reasonable.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: