Re: Bug#409882: changes in upstream
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 11:43:15AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> > Given all this, would still be possible to consider this for etch ?
>
> ...which would require another round of main and non-free conglomeration
> packages in NEW, together with removals in testing and unstable of the
> non-free ones. Don't know if we can make this happen as it's not
> depending on me.
Well, what does -release have to say about this?
Btw, nice to see my work address is working well for you. Feel free to use
that anytime.
--
Robert Millan
ACK STORM, S.L. - http://www.ackstorm.es/
Reply to: