Re: Please allow jedstate_0.5.4.transitional.1-1 and jed-extra_2.2.1-1.etch.1
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 04:50:16PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> [2007-02-06 10:10]:
> > * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> [2007-02-06 00:06]:
> > > * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> [2007-02-05 23:29]:
> > > > Request (short):
> > > > Please, allow jedstate_0.5.4.transitional.1-1 and
> > > > jed-extra_2.2.1-1.etch.1 in testing.
> > > Update: the version of jedstate currently in unstable is
> > > 0.5.4.transitional.1-2 (I added a postinst script to the pacakge).
> > New update: the version of jed-extra in unstable is now 2.2.1-1.etch.2. I
> > added two lines of autoloads in an itialization file (needed for
> > gdbmrecent). The diffs are attached below.
> This is the last update, really (or hopefully).
> After discussion in the pkg-jed-devel mailing list, we decided to improved
> the situation in the following way: the changes made in jed-extra
> 2.2.1-1.etch.2 are reverted in 2.2.1-1.etch.3, what makes this later version
> virtually the same as 2.2.1-1.etch.1. On the other hand, the jedstate
> package now in unstable (0.5.4.transitional.1-3) is now rather "functional"
> than "transitional", in the sense that it ensures that the gdbmrecent module
> will really work.
> In sum, this fixes RC Bug#406815 and removes the obsolete and unmaintained
> jedstate code from Debian, so please allow:
> * jedstate_0.5.4.transitional.1-3
> * jed-extra_2.2.1-1.etch.3
> in testing.
I've unblocked jed-extra, and am in the process of reviewing jedstate.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: