On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 04:09:07PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:47:27PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:07:13PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
Both marked as fixed in 1:9.3.4-2 in our tracker, HOWEVER:
355 files changed, 42564 insertions(+), 23165 deletions(-)
which has lots of changes to lots of files.
Is there any chance the security/RC issues can be backported?
My mistake here - I had been of the belief that bind 9.3.3 had been
promoted to testing already.
Having said that, I think it would be a good thing to pull 9.3.4-2 into
testing for the following reasons:
1. Absolutely no support from upstream for 9.3.2, other than "upgrade to 9.3.4"
As it's bind, which doesn't have the most glowing of security histories,
this one is (IMO) valid :)
2. DNSSEC actually works well in 9.3.4
Hrm... not an essential inclusion yet IMO. Would be nice etc etc.
3. Other security fixes in 9.3.3 not yet incorporated in 9.3.2
Yup, these would need to be backported too.
Pretty please?
Well, IANA-RM, but from a security point of view; as the changeset is
HUGE my recommendation is: "Unblock, 20 day lead time"