Re: New grub suitable for Etch
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> writes:
> On Monday 22 January 2007 11:28, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de> writes:
>> > I'm a bit confused by this part of the diff. I don't know what
>> > grub_memcpy does exactly, but I guess it's roughly doing what memcpy
>> > does. In that case, the new version is a significant change, are you
>> > sure there are no side-effects?
>>
>> Please accept the current grub package so I can prepare another one
>> for upload with documentation fixes. Thanks a lot.
>
> Given the reactions to the request so far, including the note from dorileo
> indicating that for one patch a different, preferred version is
> available, I does not seem that hinting this version would be a good
> idea.
Sorry Frans. I didn't get what you mean.
The last package fixes two important bugs and then I do think it's
suitable for Etch. He did a nice work working and testing the solution
and the bug reporter also tested it and it does work to him.
The patch is small and not very intrusive since it just deal on the
savedefault part of code and I don't see a high regression risk on it.
The Marc reation was indeed right to ask why Leandro has change that
part of code and then Leandro has explained why he did. There's
nothing wrong here at least to me.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: