Re: Consider ocamlgsl_0.5.2-1 for etch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 21-01-2007, Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:38:20PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>> On 14-01-2007, Sylvain Le Gall <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> > Hello,
>> > I have just uploaded ocamlgsl 0.5.2-1i to unstable. The former version
>> > (0.5.1-3) has an important bugs, that this new upstream release fix. I
>> > attach the diff between the two version.
>> > The difference is :
>> > * Upstream correction of bug (#406711: libocamlgsl-ocaml-dev: undefined
>> > reference to `ml_gsl_sf_legendre_array_size_e' when building top level
>> > * Use of ocaml.mk (shipped in ocaml package).
>> > Since the upstream correction solved a bug of severity important i think
>> > it should be good to correct this for etch.
>> > Dependency in etch are enough for this new package.
>> As suggested, i have rebuild a package 0.5.2-0etch1 which doesn't have
>> the "build system maintainance". Now it includes only the new upstream
>> I would like to upload this package to testing-proposed-update.
>> Is this OK ?
> Testing-proposed-updates is intended for RC bugfixes, and definitely not for
> new upstream releases. If you want to see this fix included in etch, please
> provide a package via unstable that includes the important bugfixes without
> the build system reorg, and reintroduce the build system changes after it's
> been accepted into etch.
I have just uploaded ocamlgsl 0.5.2-2 to unstable which only contains the new
upstream version (same diff as with 0.5.2-0etch1 given previously).
Sylvain Le Gall
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----