On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: >block 341140 by 400952 >thankyou > >Hi Anibal and Javier, > >I (as the new maintainer of autofs) would like to have the issue >settled before Etch is released... what consequences do you fear >could arise from moving the script? That's something we don't know. >The present situation forces all users of nis&autofs to manually >shuffle their init scripts around, and this is a very common >setup... Moving autofs to start later (i.e. at 20) is probably >unwise (as explained earlier), although this seems to be what most >users currently do as a workaround. > >Maybe we should talk with the release team to get this in? If the release team approves that change we'll change portmap to start at S17 as already suggested by Javier, see #400952 [0]. [0] http://bugs.debian.org/400952 >Or are you opposed to get this change into Etch? > >Regards, > >Jan Best Regards, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- http://v7w.com/anibal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature