Re: Please unblock docbook-xsl 1.71.0.dfsg.1-2
Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2007, 18:38 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net> writes:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2007, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> >> Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net> writes:
> >> I don't think that this upload matches the criteria we have set for
> >> freeze exceptions.
> > I don't know, which criteria has been violated IYO. The fixes are almost
> > simple (many typo-fixes).
>
> See Andi's mail for the freeze announcement:
>
> | - fixes for release critical bugs (i.e., bugs of severity critical,
> | grave, and serious) in all packages;
>
> Doesn't apply.
>
> | - changes for release goals, if they are not invasive;
>
> Doesn't apply.
>
> | - fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: optional
> | or extra, only when this can be done via unstable;
Well. So I have to start to copy every bug reported to upstream to
Debian BTS and then I apply to this item.
> Doesn't apply.
>
> | - translation updates and
Translation updates and fixes are included. See patch
debian/patches/80_common_locale_fixes.dpatch.
> Doesn't apply.
>
> | - documentation fixes.
>
> Doesn't apply.
[..] As always, it is the release team's goal to get as much good
software into Etch as possible. [..]
Fixed software applies to this goal.
[..] For packages which missed the freeze only for reasons outside of
the control of the maintainers, [..]
I already said, where I was. But next time, I will tell my heart to stop
making problems ... just for the Debian project. Let's see, what
happens.
But I see, you are not willing to have a look at the changes. And of
course: When the DPL started his job in 2006 is of course an important
documentation fix. This is getting too stupid for me. You may explain
this to Etch users.
EOD, Daniel
Reply to: