Re: confusion
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 17:32 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 02:45:37PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 22:45 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
>
> > > > It would be better to have a halfway modern lilypond on 32-bit archs and
> > > > nothing at all on 64-bit archs, than to have a medieval lilypond of
> > > > them.
>
> > > So, if that's the case, wouldn't the next step be to file a bug with
> > > ftpmaster requesting the removal of the 64-bit builds of the old version
> > > of lilypond from testing, after which the new lilypond would propagate to
> > > testing automatically since it would no longer be breaking those
> > > architectures?
>
> > s/file a bug with ftpmaster/mail debian-release/ :)
>
> No, absolutely not. The release team does not remove individual binary
> packages, this is the domain of the ftp team.
Ah yes; I must have been thinking of complete package removals and
forgotten the distinction wrt partial removals from testing. Apologies
for that.
Adam
Reply to: