Re: 2.6.19, kernel-package problems and what are our plans for etch ...
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
<snipp>
> Frankly, 2.6.16 was a total cock-up. Aside from all the extra work it made
> for the release team, I even found patches I had to reapply for alpha
> because they were dropped on the floor when 2.6.16 was merged to trunk. I
> am very much opposed to having two kernel versions in unstable at the same
> time.
agreed,
2.6.19 is experimental material.
guys 2.6.18 can still need stabilising,
enough open bugs
--
maks
Reply to: