Hi, Sorry, I forgot to reply to this message. On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:32:56PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > We, the Ruby Extras Team, have a package (ruby-pkg-tools) with some CDBS > > classes and other build-related tools. Usually Ruby library packages > > Build-Depend on ruby-pkg-tools, so I guess we should contact the Release > > Team before uploading a new version. > [...] > > Does this change prevent any existing packages from building? It shouldn't be a problem at all. The change is simply setting a directory in the default options to setup.rb, the installer. That is, the important change is: ------------------------------------- 8< ------------------------------------- --- 1/class/ruby-setup-rb.mk (revisión: 787) +++ 1/class/ruby-setup-rb.mk (revisión: 788) @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ include /usr/share/ruby-pkg-tools/1/class/ruby-common.mk DEB_RUBY_SETUP_CMD = setup.rb -DEB_RUBY_CONFIG_ARGS = --siteruby=$(DEB_RUBY_LIBDIR) +DEB_RUBY_CONFIG_ARGS = --siteruby=$(DEB_RUBY_LIBDIR) --siterubyver=$(DEB_RUBY_LIBDIR)/$(cdbs_ruby_ver) DEB_RUBY_CLEAN_TARGET = distclean ------------------------------------- >8 ------------------------------------- Just to try to be sure, I have written a small script to do very simple regression tests, and I tested about half of the Ruby packages. The file list is exactly the same, except for hobix (the affected package), of course. I would like ALL MAINTAINERS to PLEASE REBUILD their packages with the latest SVN version, just to be completely sure, but... Regards, -- Esteban Manchado Velázquez <zoso@debian.org> EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es Help spread it through the Net in signatures, webpages, whatever!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature