Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc
From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:16:39 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060717201639.GA8571@glandium.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060717200619.GE24000@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <87vepwqsom.fsf@nahar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <[🔎] 20060717175355.GB5799@glandium.org> <[🔎] 20060717192301.GB24076@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] 20060717200619.GE24000@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:06:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > It's not even RC at all, just a badly configured buildd.  They should
> > be using linux32.
> 
> No, it is configured correctly. The buildd provides a build environment
> which matches the standard configuration for this architecture.

Except uname -m gives s390x instead of s390...

Mike

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc
  - From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>

References:
- Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc
  - From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: s390 uninstallability review
Next by Date: Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc
Previous by thread: Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc
Next by thread: Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread