[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: why are new upstream versions of glib being uploaded?

On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 21:02 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:21:31PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Why are new upstream releases being added to upstable of the glib2.0
> > package?  We are in a freeze, I thought.  And one seems perhaps to be
> > responsible for a regression in gnucash (see #404585).  
> It's always nice when packages that need additional fixes for release can
> get them there by way of unstable, but now that we're in a full freeze
> that's not really required and there are no real grounds for the release
> team trying to impose such a restriction on maintainers.

I'm confused.  Just a week ago I asked about uploading a new upstream
release of lilypond into unstable, and I was told not to.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: