On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 21:02 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:21:31PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Why are new upstream releases being added to upstable of the glib2.0 > > package? We are in a freeze, I thought. And one seems perhaps to be > > responsible for a regression in gnucash (see #404585). > > It's always nice when packages that need additional fixes for release can > get them there by way of unstable, but now that we're in a full freeze > that's not really required and there are no real grounds for the release > team trying to impose such a restriction on maintainers. I'm confused. Just a week ago I asked about uploading a new upstream release of lilypond into unstable, and I was told not to. Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part