On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:46:04AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez schrieb am Dienstag, den 26. Dezember 2006: > > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:28:23AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > Thomas Bushnell BSG schrieb am Dienstag, den 26. Dezember 2006: > > > > > > > Why are new upstream releases being added to upstable of the glib2.0 > > > > package? We are in a freeze, I thought. And one seems perhaps to be > > > > responsible for a regression in gnucash (see #404585). > > > Eh, we are in a testing freeze, not in an unstable freeze. > > > > > > > IIRC, the guidance from vorlon was no new upstream versions to unstable, > > only to experimental. That is, until after the release. You can > > probably search the list archives and find the exact message if you > > like. > To my understanding this was until etch wasn't fully frozen. But maybe I > misunderstood something. Dear Release Team please enlighten me. I saw the situation as Roberto stated it. As aba said (http://tinyurl.com/yc4bkk): > Please continue to keep disruptive changes out of unstable, and > continue making use of experimental where appropriate. Note once > again that you can stage NEW uploads in experimental to avoid > disruption in unstable. It seems that the new upstream changes in glib would qualify as a potentially "disruptive change".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature