Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > In the interests of our users (TM) I'd like to upload lilypond 2.10 to > unstable. This is the current stable release of lilypond. > > Advantages: > Depending on how long the release takes, it may be appropriate to > transition this to testing at some point. But this is a quite minor > thing. Very unlikely. > Depending on how long the release takes, users of unstable should not > have to put up with 2.8 when 2.10 works. > > Disadvantages: > It becomes a little more laborious to make any necessary fixes to the > 2.8 in testing (they would have to go through testing-proposed-updates). Which is not a good thing if the changes have to be tested properly... > I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. I don't. > "But you could put it in experimental." > > Actually, what I intend to do is put 2.11 (upstream's experimental > branch) into experimental. You can put both of them in experimental with different source packages... Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature