I've just uploaded a new version to unstable that restores a missing file that prevents the correct loading of firmware and reverts a patch taken from Ubuntu that made firmware loading impossible. The frozen version 0.2.5-2 is really close to the one in unstable 0.2.6+svn20061108-1 that essentially adds a small patch to make it more network/interfaces friendly (so that you can use the gnome-network-*) and compilation fixes for kernel 2.6.19. The incoming package is 0.2.6+svn20061108-2. Version 0.2.5-2 manifests only the first problem (missing file) and since etch will be 2.6.18 the compilation fixes added in 0.2.6+ will be useless. Anyway, the better compatibility with the gnome stuff makes me think that it would be better to let 0.2.6+svn20061108-2 enter etch, instead of providing a minimal fix against 0.2.5. Do you agree? Cheers. -- Enrico Tassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature