[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: auctex update

>>>>>  AB == Andreas Barth [2006-12-12]

AB> Actually, on seeing these changes, I considered to refuse the
AB> changes.  On a second thought, I'm still approving the changes, as
AB> they were uploaded just in time. But this is not going to repeat.

That's your call, I do not dispute.  However, it would be helpful if you
could comment a bit more on your statement: I was under the impression
(<20061211100850.GF2560@mails.so.argh.org>) that


AB> here are the guidelines for changes that will be accepted into
AB> testing during the freeze:


AB> - fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: optional
AB> or extra, only when this can be done via unstable;

AB> - translation updates and

AB> - documentation fixes.

Which part of the changes between auctex 11.83-2.1 and auctex 11.84
rises up your concerns?

Thanks, Davide

Reply to: