Re: New cyrus-sasl2 for etch?
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:50:53PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> We ask you to take a look at the cyrus-sasl2 package in unstable and
> decide if it's fit for etch. If not, we'd appreciate a list of the
> blocking issues. If it is fit for inclusion, please advise on what we
> need to do, if anything.
Just as a side comment, I notice that the package in unstable still includes
a -dev package named libsasl2-2-dev. Why? IMHO there's no value whatsoever
in renaming the -dev package. I thought we had discussed this and I
persuaded you to revert this, but maybe we only talked about the plugin
Anyway, that's not a blocking issue by any means; it just makes me a little
nervous to hear about maintainers switching to build-depending on this new
package name, which is by its nature far less stable than the existing
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.