Re: gaim and totem transition for testing.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:26:55PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> "Gustavo Franco" <stratus@debian.org> writes:
> > I guess that gaim[0] and totem[1] transition for testing needs some love.
> > The new gaim 2 beta is a valid candidate but makes 7 packages
> > (extensions/plugins for gaim 1.x) uninstallable.
> I see no reason why these should be broken, so let's see what's needed
> to get them too into testing:
<snipped half of these packages, which are redundant comments about packages
already being accepted by luk's hint>
> * gaim-autoprofile needs to be rebuilt for the new gaim.
> I have tried to rebuild it locally with the new gaim, that
> didn't work. Seems to need manual intervention, could you look into
> that?
That's bug #396372.
> * gaim-guifications needs to be built on arm and sparc, which failed
> when trying to build the package the first time.
> Steve, could you please requeue gaim-guifications_2.13~beta4-1 on arm,
> sparc?
Done.
> * gaim-librvp_0.9.5-1 needs to be requeued on sparc, rest is fine
Done.
> * gaim-otr was missing on arm, but was built yesterday and only needs to
> be uploaded.
Yep.
> > Totem wasn't building on arm, it seems to be a matter of rebuild
> > attempt due to missing-depends that are already in place, no?
> Yes, a simple requeue should be enough.
Done.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: