[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gaim and totem transition for testing.



On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:26:55PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> "Gustavo Franco" <stratus@debian.org> writes:
> > I guess that gaim[0] and totem[1] transition for testing needs some love.

> > The new gaim 2 beta is a valid candidate but makes 7 packages
> > (extensions/plugins for gaim 1.x) uninstallable.

> I see no reason why these should be broken, so let's see what's needed
> to get them too into testing:

<snipped half of these packages, which are redundant comments about packages
already being accepted by luk's hint>

> * gaim-autoprofile needs to be rebuilt for the new gaim.

>   I have tried to rebuild it locally with the new gaim, that
>   didn't work. Seems to need manual intervention, could you look into
>   that? 

That's bug #396372.

> * gaim-guifications needs to be built on arm and sparc, which failed
>   when trying to build the package the first time.

>   Steve, could you please requeue gaim-guifications_2.13~beta4-1 on arm,
>   sparc?

Done.

> * gaim-librvp_0.9.5-1 needs to be requeued on sparc, rest is fine

Done.

> * gaim-otr was missing on arm, but was built yesterday and only needs to
>   be uploaded.

Yep.

> > Totem wasn't building on arm, it seems to be a matter of rebuild
> > attempt due to missing-depends that are already in place, no?

> Yes, a simple requeue should be enough.

Done.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: