Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
Ingo Juergensmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> What are the porters wanted to say? "We want to release with Etch?" I think
> that's obvious and the porters are doing their best to keep the port going
> and keeping up as much as possible.
Why is the most recent g-wrap still not compiled for m68k?
I have been criticized for focusing on specific cases. The
generalities also point to an arch that simply cannot keep up. I
thought I'd add some specifics, which are that the m68k team is simply
not doing what is necessary. As the rest of the computing world
continues to advance, and the m68k does not, the porters will have to
do more, and more, and more.