Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 04:20:56PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >
> >> Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > Fixes for problems are too often simply stuck in the BTS now, because in
> >> > many cases maintainer simply don't care about m68k support. I often have
> >> > to bug people to get them to release a fixed package.
> >>
> >> Does this explain why guile-1.6 is still not compiled for m68k?
> >
> > I'm not sure what you intent with this question. The patch is not that
> > old yet, but it's there:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=326905
>
> Wow, that's rich. The patch was posted to the bug log all of THIRTY
> MINUTES before your message here, and AFTER my email.
Thirty minutes to fix that bug ? Roman you rock!
> So this nonsense of "fixes are just stuck in the BTS" is still
> nonsense.
You did not ask Roman to provide examples of "fixes are just stuck in the
BTS", you picked your own bug and then complains it is not a good example
? Is not that non-sense ?
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: