Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)
- To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, kyle@debian.org, nobse@debian.org, vorlon@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, doko@debian.org
- Subject: Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:58:53 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20061012115853.GC2926@mails.so.argh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, kyle@debian.org, nobse@debian.org, vorlon@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, doko@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061012104100.GA14735@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
- References: <20061010115358.GD12664@mail.lowpingbastards.de> <[🔎] 20061012104100.GA14735@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
* Bastian Blank (waldi@debian.org) [061012 12:41]:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Two big issues are still open:
> > - hppa FTBFS
> > - alpha gcc-4.0 build dependency
>
> What should we do with them? Finally disable alpha and hppa(64)?
I don't think it is an option to ship Debian without hppa and alpha
kernels.
So, the only two options seem to me:
a) someone fixes these issues, or
b) we ship with what we have in etch now, that is 2.6.17.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: