Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Adam Thornton <email@example.com> writes:
> My position on non-free firmware is that distributing it certainly
> seems, to my untrained eye, to violate the Social Contract, and this
> needs to be addressed somehow, whether by dropping support for those
> devices, amending the Contract, or seeking a temporary waiver (or
> something else I haven't seen proposed or thought of).
Actually, we already did have a temporary waiver, to permit sarge to
release. There has been plenty of warning here.