Re: Decision about oot-modules for etch
* Daniel Baumann (firstname.lastname@example.org) [060731 16:29]:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > AFAICS ipw doesn't provide oot-modules, but only ipw*-source. Is that
> > correct?
> As I wrot in '' of the previous mail, I want ipw2100 and ipw2200
> (and, therefore also ieee8201) as oot, *although* they are already in
> mainline. But I'm not going to do that when a few weeks afterwards they
> are removed anyway in favour for a conglomeration package.
Ah, ok. Thanks.