[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Fwd: goobox REMOVED from testing

for some reason I do not fully understand, goobox was removed from
testing. I rebuild goobox both in an up to date (2006-07-02) ia32 sid
changeroot and amd64 testing system. Both builds succeed and some
testing does not reveal any show-stopper bugs. On the ia32 build there
is however a strange message during build (reported as #376351).

During operation, there are also some (unexpected) console outputs,
but these happen also on the prebuild (pre-removal) binaries. I will
investigate them later.

Is there any activity expected from the maintainers at this point or do
Bin-NMUs need to be scheduled (please do so in this case)?

I'll be offline for about a week, but afterwards I can prepare a new 
version if necessary (looking at the console messages, updating to
latest standards and similar house keeping work) which I had put off
until next upstream release (which IMHO has not happend so far).



----- Forwarded message from Debian testing watch <noreply@henning.makholm.net> -----

> From: Debian testing watch <noreply@henning.makholm.net>
> X-Katie: trille 0.051212.0307 (not in katie yet but filter as Debian automail)
> Subject: goobox REMOVED from testing
> X-Testing-Watch-Package: goobox
> X-Testing-Watch-Version: (not in testing)
> To: goobox@packages.debian.org
> X-PTS-Package: goobox
> X-PTS-Keyword: summary
> X-Unsubscribe: echo 'unsubscribe goobox' | mail pts@qa.debian.org
> FYI: The status of the goobox source package
> in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
>   Previous version: 0.9.93-2
>   Current version:  (not in testing)
>   Hint: <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
>     ##force-hint gnome-python-extras/2.14.0-l
>     ##force-hint gnome-media/2.14.2-1 nautilus-cd-burner/2.14.2-1 sound-juicer/2.14.4-2
> The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
> reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
> were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
> reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
> probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
> actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
> -- 
> This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
> See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

----- End forwarded message -----

      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: