Re: 'has RC bugs' bogusly

To: Thijs Kinkhorst <kink@squirrelmail.org>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 'has RC bugs' bogusly
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:23:22 +0200
Message-id: <20060419162322.GH408@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Thijs Kinkhorst <kink@squirrelmail.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <3574.145.99.151.130.1145463201.squirrel@wm.kinkhorst.com>
References: <u1hwtdllfpe.fsf@kempis.becket.net> <20060419160915.GE612@abydos.adm.naquadah.org> <3574.145.99.151.130.1145463201.squirrel@wm.kinkhorst.com>

* Thijs Kinkhorst (kink@squirrelmail.org) [060419 18:13]:
> On Wed, April 19, 2006 18:09, Julien Danjou wrote:
> >> It is unreasonable, I think, for bugs reported only against the
> >> experimental version to keep packages out of testing.
> >
> > This bug should have been tagged 'experimental', I guess, and so will
> > would have been ignored. I tagged it.
> 
> You should use version tracking for that, instead of the 'experimental'
> (or sarge, sid etc) tags, those are deprecated. The bug was reported with
> the right version, so there must be another problem here.

Agreed. However, britney still isn't patched for that. :/


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Reply to:

References:
- "has RC bugs" bogusly
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: "has RC bugs" bogusly
  - From: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>
- Re: 'has RC bugs' bogusly
  - From: "Thijs Kinkhorst" <kink@squirrelmail.org>

Prev by Date: Re: 'has RC bugs' bogusly
Next by Date: Re: "has RC bugs" bogusly
Previous by thread: Re: 'has RC bugs' bogusly
Next by thread: Re: "has RC bugs" bogusly
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread