[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: BinNMU for ftgl-dev?

On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:32:53PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:02:21PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:55:03PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:

> >>> Is this something that would be fixed with a binNMU of ftgl-dev?  Or
> >>> should I file a regular bug against the package and ask for a regular
> >>> upload?  It seems to work correctly on all platforms other than hppa
> >>> and m68k.

> >> It just so happens that I just worked through this on m68k. I rebuilt
> >> ftgl-dev then rebuilt gnubg against that and it built fine.

> >> It looks to me like a binNMU of ftgl-dev on m68k and hppa followed by a
> >> requeue of gnubg should do the trick.

> > Can anyone explain to me what it is about binNMUing ftgl-dev that fixes
> > this problem, so I know what to stick in a changelog entry?

> It rebuilds ftgl-dev with the current g++, changing the exception handling
> symbols in the static library to match the libraries currently used on
> hppa and m68k.

Ok, so this is a left-over from the c2a transition?

BinNMUs queued.

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: