On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:32:53PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes: > > On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:02:21PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:55:03PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > >>> Is this something that would be fixed with a binNMU of ftgl-dev? Or > >>> should I file a regular bug against the package and ask for a regular > >>> upload? It seems to work correctly on all platforms other than hppa > >>> and m68k. > >> It just so happens that I just worked through this on m68k. I rebuilt > >> ftgl-dev then rebuilt gnubg against that and it built fine. > >> It looks to me like a binNMU of ftgl-dev on m68k and hppa followed by a > >> requeue of gnubg should do the trick. > > Can anyone explain to me what it is about binNMUing ftgl-dev that fixes > > this problem, so I know what to stick in a changelog entry? > It rebuilds ftgl-dev with the current g++, changing the exception handling > symbols in the static library to match the libraries currently used on > hppa and m68k. Ok, so this is a left-over from the c2a transition? BinNMUs queued. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature