On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:02:21PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:55:03PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Is this something that would be fixed with a binNMU of ftgl-dev? Or > > should I file a regular bug against the package and ask for a regular > > upload? It seems to work correctly on all platforms other than hppa and > > m68k. > It just so happens that I just worked through this on m68k. I rebuilt > ftgl-dev then rebuilt gnubg against that and it built fine. > It looks to me like a binNMU of ftgl-dev on m68k and hppa followed by > a requeue of gnubg should do the trick. Can anyone explain to me what it is about binNMUing ftgl-dev that fixes this problem, so I know what to stick in a changelog entry? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature