[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug in the testing scripts (?)



On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:00:21AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:39:26PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:08:31PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > > I temporarily upgraded Bug#348667 to serious to prevent procmail from
> > > > entering testing (while I try to investigate why in earth this package
> > > > builds with or without biff support depending on the phase of the moon),
> > > > but the testing monitor says it has just entered testing.

> > > Ditto for geotoad which re-entered testing despite its RC bug. The
> > > excuses file doesn't show britney seeing that bug at all.

> > Yes, something has screwed the RC buglist used as input by britney.

> spohr temporarily ran low on disk space a day or two ago. I cleaned it
> up as soon as I noticed by compressing some of the BTS' spam archives
> (and I see Blars has since done more), but it's possible that this
> temporarily broke the bug list.

index.db was truncated; I poked Don on IRC and he fixed it up for us.  Ryan
has disabled britney for the time being as well, while we sort out how to
roll back the bad run.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: