Re: what's up with gcc 3.3 and 3.4 ?
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 09:51:02PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins writes:
> > Package ccmalloc explicitly build-depends on all supported C++
> > compilers because it builds a specific module for each.
> > Two bugs have been filed against it suggesting that g++-3.3 (BTS
> > 343034) and g++-3.4 (BTS 342959) are on their way out. Is that true?
> > I don't recall seeing any sort of official announcement about this.
> what kind of official announcement do you need?
I've come to expect a note to a prominent place like -devel,
or -devel-announce. The sort of thing we've seen for the
various transitions recently:
For instance, there was no mention in the release team plans for etch: