Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell
Kurt Roeckx <email@example.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
>> Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what
>> to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be
>> rebuilt, and in that case it would need a package name change and yet
>> another painful library transition. Obviously I don't want to do this
>> unless absolutely necessary.
> Since this seems to be a C++ package that only exports a C
> interface, a simple rebuild should do. There is no need to
> change the name.
So partial upgrades wouldn't break, then?
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.