Re: should packages begin using /srv ?
Hello
On 2005-12-21 Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Monday 19 December 2005 12:05, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:23:24AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > > is the release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented
> > > > on IRC that it would be good to have this decission made by the team
> > > > and in an archived media.)
> > If no one else has any comments, I guess you can take that for silent
> > agreement with my position. :)
>
> I'm not so sure, that "no comment" is widely and forever seen as consent.
I'm against simple "me too" mails, but if more comments are what is needed
to get this into our policy then you have mine.
Having this kind of data in a different location (/opt, /home, /var,
/usr/local, /data) on every customer server has bugged me since long :)
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM
> like Isaac does, that is, webservers should use /srv/www, not /var/www.
ack
bye,
-christian-
Reply to: