Hi, On Monday 19 December 2005 12:05, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:23:24AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > is the release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented > > > on IRC that it would be good to have this decission made by the team > > > and in an archived media.) > If no one else has any comments, I guess you can take that for silent > agreement with my position. :) I'm not so sure, that "no comment" is widely and forever seen as consent. Anyway, shall I file a bug against policy now, to include FHS 2.3 instead of 2.1 ? I think I should. Otherwise it would look to me like the release team can simply overwrite policy decissions. BTW, I also read http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM like Isaac does, that is, webservers should use /srv/www, not /var/www. regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpBfjy9ACuAf.pgp
Description: PGP signature