Re: buildd maintainers stuck?
Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
>
>> How about making porters responsible for running the buildds for their
>> arch?
>
> I consider anyone who runs a buildd for an arch a porter already so
> that is already there.
If they are unwilling to cooperate with the rest of the porters, and
they aren't participating, then I don't think they are a porter.
Calling a dog's tail a leg doesn't make it one.
Thomas
Reply to: