Re: buildd maintainers stuck?
Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
>
>> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
>>
>>> No, buildd admins are responsible for fixing buildd problems. *Porters* are
>>> responsible for *ensuring their port is a viable release candidate*. Given
>>> that one of the release criteria is "keeping up with unstable", porters most
>>> definitely *are* expected to help make sure packages are getting built.
>>
>> I think the problem is that if the buildds don't talk to the porters,
>> and the porters aren't allowed to upload binNMUs themselves, then they
>> are essentially barred from their assigned task.
>>
>> How about we make porters responsible for running their buildds
>> instead of the current arrangement?
>
> You mean allow porters to add buildds (or just buildd admins) to the
> arch to increase redundancy? This can be a gradual process.
How about making porters responsible for running the buildds for their
arch?
Reply to: