On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:14:15PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Andreas Barth wrote: > >On the other hand, we try to get some parts of Qt/KDE/jack in tonight. > >Well, such runs usually take more than one try, but the situation will > >probably look much better soon enough. > I doubt that this is possible *tonight* without making much more breakage > than you actually want to make, due to the stuff clogged behind libpng (bad > libpng! Bad!) But below I have some hints which should get KDE/JACK in > with fairly little breakage once the libpng and openssl clogs are cleared, > and once kdelibs and kdebase build (hopefully within the week). The point of the hint in question is to get an unclouded look at *what* is still missing in order to get this batch in. > So this is the proposed KDE/JACK hint. It will have to be a force-hint. That isn't going to happen until after we confirm that the breakage of packages from the hint is both acceptable, and necessary. > This should replace the previous KDE/JACK/unixodbc/icu/libmusicbrainz > /python-qt3 hints succesfully. It won't really be ready to go until the > issues tying it into libpng and openssl are resolved though. Right, and for that reason I'm not going to spend too much time chasing my tail on this right now given that a lot can change between now and openssl/GNOME1 being ready. > # Lots of old FTBFS, ties JACK to libsigc++, gtkmm > remove ardour/0.9beta29-1 severity raised on bug #333432. > # Ties qt-x11-free into opensp and gnucash > remove libaqbanking/1.5.99+1.6.0beta-1 Agreed that this is a candidate for removal when we get closer. > easy maxdb-7.5.00/7.5.00.30-3 libdbd-maxdb-perl/7.5.00.32-1 > php4-maxdb/7.5.00.30-1 Heh, any php4 package built only 63 days ago that *isn't* blocking on the new php4 is RC-buggy... new bug, #334823. > # xdrawchem depends on qt-x11-free, will go back in with it > remove xdrawchem/1.9.4-3 > easy ghemical/1.90-2 libghemical/1.90-1 mpqc/2.2.3-2 openbabel/1.100.2-3 > # Alternately, all of the above could be thrown into the KDE hint too Right, this one looks good; hint added. A couple of the other hints you listed have already been run, or nearly so. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature